Growth

How to Find Low-Competition Keywords Without Paying for a Tool

When you're starting out, the worst thing you can do is chase big keywords. You will not rank for "best running shoes" or "mortgage calculator" this year, no matter how good your page is — those are owned by sites with a decade of authority and a budget. Your entire game early on is finding the specific, low-competition searches those big sites can't be bothered to cover. And you can find them without paying a cent.

Here's the free toolkit I actually use.

Google autocomplete. Start typing your topic and watch what Google suggests. Those are real searches, ranked by demand. Add a letter and the suggestions change. Type "how much to feed a" and Google hands you a list of exactly what people want a calculator for.

"People also ask" and "Related searches." Run a search and look at the question boxes in the middle and the related searches at the bottom. That's Google literally telling you the adjacent things people want answered. Each one is a potential page.

Reddit and forums. Search your topic on Reddit and read the questions people actually ask in their own words — which is usually different from how a marketer would phrase it. Real questions make great long-tail targets, and they're often things no one has written a good page for.

Now the part that replaces an expensive tool: judging competition by eyeballing page one. This is cruder than a difficulty score but it works. Search your keyword and look at who's actually ranking:

If page one is all big, established brands — skip it, you can't win yet. If page one is a mess of old forum threads, thin junk, ad-stuffed pages, or results that don't really answer the question — that's your opening. When the existing results are bad, being genuinely good is enough to climb. Most of my calculator targets pass exactly this test: the current page-one results are recycled and outdated, so a clean, accurate, well-sourced version has room to move up.

Prioritize searches with clear intent and a number or a decision attached — "how much," "vs," "calculator," "is it worth it." Those convert better and are usually less contested than broad informational terms.

Paid tools are genuinely faster and worth it once you're making money — I'm not pretending otherwise. If you'd rather pay for speed, SEMrush rolls the keyword research, difficulty scoring, and competitor digging into one place. But when you're starting from zero, this free stack will find you more rankable keywords than you can write posts for. The bottleneck is never the keywords. It's doing the work. Once you've got your list, point it at something that ranks well — for me that's usually a calculator — and start building the cluster.